Sub-custody survey 2017 methodology
All users of the services of sub-custodians (agent banks), from broker-dealers to global custodians, are asked to rate their performance.
Respondents are asked to rate sub-custodians in all countries in which they operate. The performance of sub-custodians is rated separately in each country and published in the April/May issue.
Respondents are asked to rate their sub-custodians across 12 service categories (see list below). Respondents are permitted to rate up to 10 sub-custodians in each country.
For each country there will be two tables: unweighted and weighted. The weighted table allows for assets under custody as well as how important the respondents consider a certain category to be.
Unweighted table
For
each country, all valid responses for each sub-custodian are averaged to
calculate an unweighted score.
Weighted tables
Step one: weighting by assets under custody.
Weighted versions of all unweighted tables are produced.
First, an allowance is made so that a greater weight is given to the views of larger respondents, defined by their assets under custody (AuC).
Respondents are asked to choose a band that reflects the size of their AuC in billions of US dollars. The boundaries of each band are determined by the AuC of respondents to last year’s survey. They are chosen so an approximately equal amount of respondents fit into each band.
A weighting is attached to each band as follows:
- <$100bn 0.6
- $100bn – $200bn 0.8
- $200bn – $500bn 1
- $500bn – $1000bn 1.2
- >$1000bn 1.4
Each respondent’s unweighted rating of a sub-custodian is then multiplied by the appropriate weighting. For example, if a global custodian with assets under custody of $567bn gives a sub-custodian an average score of 6.7, its contribution to the weighted score is 6.7 x 1.2 = 8.04. This weighted rating is then averaged with all other respondents’ weighted ratings.
Where a figure for assets under custody is not disclosed a default weighting of 1 is assigned.
Step two: weighting by category importance
Respondents
are asked to rank the importance of each of the service categories. These
respondent rankings are then averaged. These average ranks are then used to
create a weighting for each service category, which theoretically could range
between zero and two but will depend on the actual responses. The average
weighting is one to preserve comparability with unweighted scores.
For clarity, if on average respondents consider ‘relationship management’ to be the most important category, it will be given the greatest weighting when calculating scores in the weighted by importance tables.
Qualification
Qualification
is on a country-by-country (rather than regional) basis. To qualify in each
country, a sub-custodian needs to receive a minimum of three responses per
market
If a sub-custodian is rated multiple times by the same respondent firm in the same country the ratings will be averaged and will only count as a single response for the purposes of qualification.
Categories
Sub-custodians are rated across 12 main categories, of which some are divided up into sub-categories. The 12 main categories have equal weight. Where a main category is split into sub-categories, an average of the sub-categories is taken to produce the score for the main category.
The
categories are as follows:
- Settlement
- Efficiency of
pre-settlement matching and reporting
- Failed trade
management
- Timeliness, accuracy
and completeness of reporting
- Competitiveness of
cut off times
- Safekeeping
- Income collection
- Timeliness, accuracy
and completeness of notifications
- Timeliness, accuracy and completeness of confirmations
- Corporate actions
- Timeliness, accuracy
and completeness of notifications
- Timeliness, accuracy
and completeness of confirmations
- Competitiveness of
response cut off times
- Client service
- Quality of subject
matter expertise
- Responsiveness and
effectiveness of enquiry management
- Availability and
calling frequency
- Reporting capability
- Flexibility of
delivery channels
- Quality and
timeliness and of SWIFT and other reporting
- Tax reclaim services
- Solicitation of
timely tax documentation
- Quality of reporting
- Market information
- Relevance
of marketing information
- Timeliness
of market information
- Relationship
management
- Understanding of your
business needs
- Ability to set up new
products when requested
- Quality of subject
matter expertise
- Responsiveness and
effectiveness of enquiry management
- Availability and
calling frequency
- Securities lending
fail coverage
- Regulatory expertise
and capability
- Product development
and innovation
Found this useful?
Take a complimentary trial of the FOW Marketing Intelligence Platform – the comprehensive source of news and analysis across the buy- and sell- side.
Gain access to:
- A single source of in-depth news, insight and analysis across Asset Management, Securities Finance, Custody, Fund Services and Derivatives
- Our interactive database, optimized to enable you to summarise data and build graphs outlining market activity
- Exclusive whitepapers, supplements and industry analysis curated and published by Futures & Options World
- Breaking news, daily and weekly alerts on the markets most relevant to you